AS

Happy Birthday to Me!

I had to take a break from thinking about Safeco and Protech. It is bizarre to me that I am having such a weird experience with an agency I am supposed to trust(?) to do the right thing because I have faithfully paid my premiums to Safeco since 2011.

I received a letter from Cheryl Flaherty, Consumer Affairs Manager for Safeco/Liberty Mutual. “We have conducted a thorough investigation and have determined that your allegations are unfounded and of no merit. We request that you cease and desist from any further comments or allegations related to any employee of Safeco Insurance/Liberty Mutual Insurance Company that was involved in the adjustment of your claim.”

Now, cease and desist raises my hackles. Cease and desist is usually a legal demand. Coming from a Consumer Affairs Manager, it reads like a threat. Cease and desist, or what? What about this thorough investigation? How could it be thorough if you never spoke with me?

Flaherty goes on: “Please be aware that as of the date of this letter (21 February 2019), First National Insurance Company of America/Safeco Insurance will only respond to issues related specifically to your claim and specifically only to new information related to the adjustment of the claim.”

For the past year, I have been doing nothing but attempting to get questions answered about my claim. It has been an exercise in futility as the only person apparently qualified to work my claim, the man who refuses to answer my questions, is the same man who orchestrated grand theft. I cannot understand how and why this nightmare experience continues.

All of the questions I had about why it took 19 days to get a response to my initial report of the damage to my home caused by a tree that fell during high winds; about why proper plans were never drawn for the rebuilding of my home; about why the contractor, Protech, was paid for goods and services not provided or in evidence on this toft.

Today, as a birthday present to me and in compliance with Flaherty’s instructions, I sent a request for the itemized statements or invoices submitted by Protech to Safeco for payment. I have one statement and it is for the items that do not exist here but for which Safeco paid Protech in excess of $80K. This was the last payment. Six others preceded it. I should have those itemized statements, doncha think?

aging · AS · Bad Faith · Criminal Organizations · Disaster · Economic Anger · Homeownership · Insurance Claims · Paralegal Studies · power · small claims court · trauma

Finally, An Independent Inspector

After six months of wrangling with Safeco Senior Claims Resolution Specialist Kent Stiles,  whom I fired one month ago, enduring his continued attempts to humiliate and abuse me, his attempt to go through the back door of Innovations Properties to get me hooked up with the contractor network that I thought I was already a part of, an independent cost consultant was called in.

Stiles did not want him to know about the 19 days of delay that characterize the first days of my claim that was handled by a fellow named Trevor Haaswyk, now employed elsewhere. Wonder if I should track him down and get a statement? I may present this in civil court if this matter is not resolved to my satisfaction.

The inspector was treated to a first-eye look at the hideous workmanship that is Protech’s signature if all of the online reviews are to be believed. He photographed the overtorqued roof that is twisting the house and causing the apex joint in the centers of the house and garage, front and back, to separate and jut forward and backward. He saw how they deviated from the “plans”, a different set than those presented to me over 18 months of deceit.

The inspector also had a look at the last estimate submitted, documenting that Protech claims they were paid over $238K when their initial bid was $190K. They submitted no paperwork indicating why they needed this extra money. I have no documentation in this house for anything installed, no warranties for appliances installed, and a previous estimate that netted Protech $80K. That estimate was not presented for inspection. Guess the State Contractors License Board will have to take that into account.

I know the inspector found we were charged for items and services that never happened or were never installed on this property. I know he took note of the shoddy workmanship in evidence.