AS · Criminal Organizations · Disaster · News and politics · observations · power · trauma

Done With Democrats

Got nothing for the DNC. Got nothing for any democrat that supported the resignation of Al Franken without any investigation of the claims against him.

Kamala Harris and any other democrat women who supported this are hypocrites. Why didn’t you fight to oust Trump?

The democratic party is not democratic. I think they are complicit with the rethuglicans.

As long as the Orange Beast occupies the Oval Office, I am done with democrats who do nothing to get him out.

AS · Law · power · Sociology

MENU

RETURN HOME

HOME > LIBRARY > CIVIL WAR ERA > ALEXANDER STEPHENS > “CORNER STONE” SPEECH

“Corner Stone” Speech

Alexander H. Stephens

Savannah, Georgia

March 21, 1861

When perfect quiet is restored, I shall proceed. I cannot speak so long as there is any noise or confusion. I shall take my time I feel quite prepared to spend the night with you if necessary. I very much regret that everyone who desires cannot hear what I have to say. Not that I have any display to make, or anything very entertaining to present, but such views as I have to give, I wish all, not only in this city, but in this State, and throughout our Confederate Republic, could hear, who have a desire to hear them.

I was remarking that we are passing through one of the greatest revolutions in the annals of the world. Seven States have within the last three months thrown off an old government and formed a new. This revolution has been signally marked, up to this time, by the fact of its having been accomplished without the loss of a single drop of blood.

This new constitution. or form of government, constitutes the subject to which your attention will be partly invited. In reference to it, I make this first general remark: it amply secures all our ancient rights, franchises, and liberties. All the great principles of Magna Charta are retained in it. No citizen is deprived of life, liberty, or property, but by the judgment of his peers under the laws of the land. The great principle of religious liberty, which was the honor and pride of the old constitution, is still maintained and secured. All the essentials of the old constitution, which have endeared it to the hearts of the American people, have been preserved and perpetuated. Some changes have been made. Some of these I should have preferred not to have seen made; but other important changes do meet my cordial approbation. They form great improvements upon the old constitution. So, taking the whole new constitution, I have no hesitancy in giving it as my judgment that it is decidedly better than the old.

Allow me briefly to allude to some of these improvements. The question of building up class interests, or fostering one branch of industry to the prejudice of another under the exercise of the revenue power, which gave us so much trouble under the old constitution, is put at rest forever under the new. We allow the imposition of no duty with a view of giving advantage to one class of persons, in any trade or business, over those of another. All, under our system, stand upon the same broad principles of perfect equality. Honest labor and enterprise are left free and unrestricted in whatever pursuit they may be engaged. This old thorn of the tariff, which was the cause of so much irritation in the old body politic, is removed forever from the new.

Again, the subject of internal improvements, under the power of Congress to regulate commerce, is put at rest under our system. The power, claimed by construction under the old constitution, was at least a doubtful one; it rested solely upon construction. We of the South, generally apart from considerations of constitutional principles, opposed its exercise upon grounds of its inexpediency and injustice. Notwithstanding this opposition, millions of money, from the common treasury had been drawn for such purposes. Our opposition sprang from no hostility to commerce, or to all necessary aids for facilitating it. With us it was simply a question upon whom the burden should fall. In Georgia, for instance, we have done as much for the cause of internal improvements as any other portion of the country, according to population and means. We have stretched out lines of railroads from the seaboard to the mountains; dug down the hills, and filled up the valleys at a cost of not less than $25,000,000. All this was done to open an outlet for our products of the interior, and those to the west of us, to reach the marts of the world. No State was in greater need of such facilities than Georgia, but we did not ask that these works should be made by appropriations out of the common treasury. The cost of the grading, the superstructure, and the equipment of our roads was borne by those who had entered into the enterprise. Nay, more not only the cost of the iron no small item in the aggregate cost was borne in the same way, but we were compelled to pay into the common treasury several millions of dollars for the privilege of importing the iron, after the price was paid for it abroad. What justice was there in taking this money, which our people paid into the common treasury on the importation of our iron, and applying it to the improvement of rivers and harbors elsewhere? The true principle is to subject the commerce of every locality, to whatever burdens may be necessary to facilitate it. If Charleston harbor needs improvement, let the commerce of Charleston bear the burden. If the mouth of the Savannah river has to be cleared out, let the sea-going navigation which is benefited by it, bear the burden. So with the mouths of the Alabama and Mississippi river. Just as the products of the interior, our cotton, wheat, corn, and other articles, have to bear the necessary rates of freight over our railroads to reach the seas. This is again the broad principle of perfect equality and justice, and it is especially set forth and established in our new constitution.

Another feature to which I will allude is that the new constitution provides that cabinet ministers and heads of departments may have the privilege of seats upon the floor of the Senate and House of Representatives and may have the right to participate in the debates and discussions upon the various subjects of administration. I should have preferred that this provision should have gone further, and required the President to select his constitutional advisers from the Senate and House of Representatives. That would have conformed entirely to the practice in the British Parliament, which, in my judgment, is one of the wisest provisions in the British constitution. It is the only feature that saves that government. It is that which gives it stability in its facility to change its administration. Ours, as it is, is a great approximation to the right principle.

Under the old constitution, a secretary of the treasury for instance, had no opportunity, save by his annual reports, of presenting any scheme or plan of finance or other matter. He had no opportunity of explaining, expounding, enforcing, or defending his views of policy; his only resort was through the medium of an organ. In the British parliament, the premier brings in his budget and stands before the nation responsible for its every item. If it is indefensible, he falls before the attacks upon it, as he ought to. This will now be the case to a limited extent under our system. In the new constitution, provision has been made by which our heads of departments can speak for themselves and the administration, in behalf of its entire policy, without resorting to the indirect and highly objectionable medium of a newspaper. It is to be greatly hoped that under our system we shall never have what is known as a government organ.

Another change in the constitution relates to the length of the tenure of the presidential office. In the new constitution it is six years instead of four, and the President rendered ineligible for a re-election. This is certainly a decidedly conservative change. It will remove from the incumbent all temptation to use his office or exert the powers confided to him for any objects of personal ambition. The only incentive to that higher ambition which should move and actuate one holding such high trusts in his hands, will be the good of the people, the advancement, prosperity, happiness, safety, honor, and true glory of the confederacy.

But not to be tedious in enumerating the numerous changes for the better, allow me to allude to one other though last, not least. The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution. Jefferson in his forecast, had anticipated this, as the “rock upon which the old Union would split.” He was right. What was conjecture with him, is now a realized fact. But whether he fully comprehended the great truth upon which that rock stood and stands, may be doubted. The prevailing ideas entertained by him and most of the leading statesmen at the time of the formation of the old constitution, were that the enslavement of the African was in violation of the laws of nature; that it was wrong in principle, socially, morally, and politically. It was an evil they knew not well how to deal with, but the general opinion of the men of that day was that, somehow or other in the order of Providence, the institution would be evanescent and pass away. This idea, though not incorporated in the constitution, was the prevailing idea at that time. The constitution, it is true, secured every essential guarantee to the institution while it should last, and hence no argument can be justly urged against the constitutional guarantees thus secured, because of the common sentiment of the day. Those ideas, however, were fundamentally wrong. They rested upon the assumption of the equality of races. This was an error. It was a sandy foundation, and the government built upon it fell when the “storm came and the wind blew.”

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science. It has been so even amongst us. Many who hear me, perhaps, can recollect well, that this truth was not generally admitted, even within their day. The errors of the past generation still clung to many as late as twenty years ago. Those at the North, who still cling to these errors, with a zeal above knowledge, we justly denominate fanatics. All fanaticism springs from an aberration of the mind from a defect in reasoning. It is a species of insanity. One of the most striking characteristics of insanity, in many instances, is forming correct conclusions from fancied or erroneous premises; so with the anti-slavery fanatics. Their conclusions are right if their premises were. They assume that the negro is equal, and hence conclude that he is entitled to equal privileges and rights with the white man. If their premises were correct, their conclusions would be logical and just but their premise being wrong, their whole argument fails. I recollect once of having heard a gentleman from one of the northern States, of great power and ability, announce in the House of Representatives, with imposing effect, that we of the South would be compelled, ultimately, to yield upon this subject of slavery, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics, as it was in physics or mechanics. That the principle would ultimately prevail. That we, in maintaining slavery as it exists with us, were warring against a principle, a principle founded in nature, the principle of the equality of men. The reply I made to him was, that upon his own grounds, we should, ultimately, succeed, and that he and his associates, in this crusade against our institutions, would ultimately fail. The truth announced, that it was as impossible to war successfully against a principle in politics as it was in physics and mechanics, I admitted; but told him that it was he, and those acting with him, who were warring against a principle. They were attempting to make things equal which the Creator had made unequal.

In the conflict thus far, success has been on our side, complete throughout the length and breadth of the Confederate States. It is upon this, as I have stated, our social fabric is firmly planted; and I cannot permit myself to doubt the ultimate success of a full recognition of this principle throughout the civilized and enlightened world.

As I have stated, the truth of this principle may be slow in development, as all truths are and ever have been, in the various branches of science. It was so with the principles announced by Galileo it was so with Adam Smith and his principles of political economy. It was so with Harvey, and his theory of the circulation of the blood. It is stated that not a single one of the medical profession, living at the time of the announcement of the truths made by him, admitted them. Now, they are universally acknowledged. May we not, therefore, look with confidence to the ultimate universal acknowledgment of the truths upon which our system rests? It is the first government ever instituted upon the principles in strict conformity to nature, and the ordination of Providence, in furnishing the materials of human society. Many governments have been founded upon the principle of the subordination and serfdom of certain classes of the same race; such were and are in violation of the laws of nature. Our system commits no such violation of nature’s laws. With us, all of the white race, however high or low, rich or poor, are equal in the eye of the law. Not so with the negro. Subordination is his place. He, by nature, or by the curse against Canaan, is fitted for that condition which he occupies in our system. The architect, in the construction of buildings, lays the foundation with the proper material-the granite; then comes the brick or the marble. The substratum of our society is made of the material fitted by nature for it, and by experience we know that it is best, not only for the superior, but for the inferior race, that it should be so. It is, indeed, in conformity with the ordinance of the Creator. It is not for us to inquire into the wisdom of His ordinances, or to question them. For His own purposes, He has made one race to differ from another, as He has made “one star to differ from another star in glory.” The great objects of humanity are best attained when there is conformity to His laws and decrees, in the formation of governments as well as in all things else. Our confederacy is founded upon principles in strict conformity with these laws. This stone which was rejected by the first builders “is become the chief of the corner” the real “corner-stone” in our new edifice. I have been asked, what of the future? It has been apprehended by some that we would have arrayed against us the civilized world. I care not who or how many they may be against us, when we stand upon the eternal principles of truth, if we are true to ourselves and the principles for which we contend, we are obliged to, and must triumph.

Thousands of people who begin to understand these truths are not yet completely out of the shell; they do not see them in their length and breadth. We hear much of the civilization and Christianization of the barbarous tribes of Africa. In my judgment, those ends will never be attained, but by first teaching them the lesson taught to Adam, that “in the sweat of his brow he should eat his bread,” and teaching them to work, and feed, and clothe themselves.

But to pass on: Some have propounded the inquiry whether it is practicable for us to go on with the confederacy without further accessions? Have we the means and ability to maintain nationality among the powers of the earth? On this point I would barely say, that as anxiously as we all have been, and are, for the border States, with institutions similar to ours, to join us, still we are abundantly able to maintain our position, even if they should ultimately make up their minds not to cast their destiny with us.
That they ultimately will join us be compelled to do it is my confident belief; but we can get on very well without them, even if they should not.

We have all the essential elements of a high national career. The idea has been given out at the North, and even in the border States, that we are too small and too weak to maintain a separate nationality. This is a great mistake. In extent of territory we embrace five hundred and sixty-four thousand square miles and upward. This is upward of two hundred thousand square miles more than was included within the limits of the original thirteen States. It is an area of country more than double the territory of France or the Austrian empire. France, in round numbers, has but two hundred and twelve thousand square miles. Austria, in round numbers, has two hundred and forty-eight thousand square miles. Ours is greater than both combined. It is greater than all France, Spain, Portugal, and Great Britain, including England, Ireland, and Scotland, together. In population we have upward of five millions, according to the census of 1860; this includes white and black. The entire population, including white and black, of the original thirteen States, was less than four millions in 1790, and still less in 76, when the independence of our fathers was achieved. If they, with a less population, dared maintain their independence against the greatest power on earth, shall we have any apprehension of maintaining ours now?

In point of material wealth and resources, we are greatly in advance of them. The taxable property of the Confederate States cannot be less than twenty-two hundred millions of dollars! This, I think I venture but little in saying, may be considered as five times more than the colonies possessed at the time they achieved their independence. Georgia, alone, possessed last year, according to the report of our comptroller-general, six hundred and seventy-two millions of taxable property. The debts of the seven confederate States sum up in the aggregate less than eighteen millions, while the existing debts of the other of the late United States sum up in the aggregate the enormous amount of one hundred and seventy-four millions of dollars. This is without taking into account the heavy city debts, corporation debts, and railroad debts, which press, and will continue to press, as a heavy incubus upon the resources of those States. These debts, added to others, make a sum total not much under five hundred millions of dollars. With such an area of territory as we have-with such an amount of population-with a climate and soil unsurpassed by any on the face of the earth-with such resources already at our command-with productions which control the commerce of the world-who can entertain any apprehensions as to our ability to succeed, whether others join us or not?

It is true, I believe I state but the common sentiment, when I declare my earnest desire that the border States should join us. The differences of opinion that existed among us anterior to secession, related more to the policy in securing that result by co-operation than from any difference upon the ultimate security we all looked to in common.

These differences of opinion were more in reference to policy than principle, and as Mr. Jefferson said in his inaugural, in 1801, after the heated contest preceding his election, that there might be differences of opinion without differences on principle, and that all, to some extent, had been Federalists and all Republicans; so it may now be said of us, that whatever differences of opinion as to the best policy in having a co-operation with our border sister slave States, if the worst came to the worst, that as we were all co-operationists, we are now all for independence, whether they come or not.

In this connection I take this occasion to state, that I was not without grave and serious apprehensions, that if the worst came to the worst, and cutting loose from the old government should be the only remedy for our safety and security, it would be attended with much more serious ills than it has been as yet. Thus far we have seen none of those incidents which usually attend revolutions. No such material as such convulsions usually throw up has been seen. Wisdom, prudence, and patriotism, have marked every step of our progress thus far. This augurs well for the future, and it is a matter of sincere gratification to me, that I am enabled to make the declaration. Of the men I met in the Congress at Montgomery, I may be pardoned for saying this, an abler, wiser, a more conservative, deliberate, determined, resolute, and patriotic body of men, I never met in my life. Their works speak for them; the provisional government speaks for them; the constitution of the permanent government will be a lasting monument of their worth, merit, and statesmanship.

But to return to the question of the future. What is to be the result of this revolution?

Will every thing, commenced so well, continue as it has begun? In reply to this anxious inquiry, I can only say it all depends upon ourselves. A young man starting out in life on his majority, with health, talent, and ability, under a favoring Providence, may be said to be the architect of his own fortunes. His destinies are in his own hands. He may make for himself a name, of honor or dishonor, according to his own acts. If he plants himself upon truth, integrity, honor and uprightness, with industry, patience and energy, he cannot fail of success. So it is with us. We are a young republic, just entering upon the arena of nations; we will be the architects of our own fortunes. Our destiny, under Providence, is in our own hands. With wisdom, prudence, and statesmanship on the part of our public men, and intelligence, virtue and patriotism on the part of the people, success, to the full measures of our most sanguine hopes, may be looked for. But if unwise counsels prevail if we become divided if schisms arise if dissentions spring up if factions are engendered if party spirit, nourished by unholy personal ambition shall rear its hydra head, I have no good to prophesy for you. Without intelligence, virtue, integrity, and patriotism on the part of the people, no republic or representative government can be durable or stable.

We have intelligence, and virtue, and patriotism. All that is required is to cultivate and perpetuate these. Intelligence will not do without virtue. France was a nation of philosophers. These philosophers become Jacobins. They lacked that virtue, that devotion to moral principle, and that patriotism which is essential to good government Organized upon principles of perfect justice and right-seeking amity and friendship with all other powers-I see no obstacle in the way of our upward and onward progress. Our growth, by accessions from other States, will depend greatly upon whether we present to the world, as I trust we shall, a better government than that to which neighboring States belong. If we do this, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Arkansas cannot hesitate long; neither can Virginia, Kentucky, and Missouri. They will necessarily gravitate to us by an imperious law. We made ample provision in our constitution for the admission of other States; it is more guarded, and wisely so, I think, than the old constitution on the same subject, but not too guarded to receive them as fast as it may be proper. Looking to the distant future, and, perhaps, not very far distant either, it is not beyond the range of possibility, and even probability, that all the great States of the north-west will gravitate this way, as well as Tennessee, Kentucky, Missouri, Arkansas, etc. Should they do so, our doors are wide enough to receive them, but not until they are ready to assimilate with us in principle.

The process of disintegration in the old Union may be expected to go on with almost absolute certainty if we pursue the right course. We are now the nucleus of a growing power which, if we are true to ourselves, our destiny, and high mission, will become the controlling power on this continent. To what extent accessions will go on in the process of time, or where it will end, the future will determine. So far as it concerns States of the old Union, this process will be upon no such principles of reconstruction as now spoken of, but upon reorganization and new assimilation. Such are some of the glimpses of the future as I catch them.

But at first we must necessarily meet with the inconveniences and difficulties and embarrassments incident to all changes of government. These will be felt in our postal affairs and changes in the channel of trade. These inconveniences, it is to be hoped, will be but temporary, and must be borne with patience and forbearance.

As to whether we shall have war with our late confederates, or whether all matters of differences between us shall be amicably settled, I can only say that the prospect for a peaceful adjustment is better, so far as I am informed, than it has been. The prospect of war is, at least, not so threatening as it has been. The idea of coercion, shadowed forth in President Lincoln’s inaugural, seems not to be followed up thus far so vigorously as was expected. Fort Sumter, it is believed, will soon be evacuated. What course will be pursued toward Fort Pickens, and the other forts on the gulf, is not so well understood. It is to be greatly desired that all of them should be surrendered. Our object is peace, not only with the North, but with the world. All matters relating to the public property, public liabilities of the Union when we were members of it, we are ready and willing to adjust and settle upon the principles of right, equity, and good faith. War can be of no more benefit to the North than to us. Whether the intention of evacuating Fort Sumter is to be received as an evidence of a desire for a peaceful solution of our difficulties with the United States, or the result of necessity, I will not undertake to say. I would feign hope the former. Rumors are afloat, however, that it is the result of necessity. All I can say to you, therefore, on that point is, keep your armor bright and your powder dry.

The surest way to secure peace, is to show your ability to maintain your rights. The principles and position of the present administration of the United States the republican party present some puzzling questions. While it is a fixed principle with them never to allow the increase of a foot of slave territory, they seem to be equally determined not to part with an inch “of the accursed soil.” Notwithstanding their clamor against the institution, they seemed to be equally opposed to getting more, or letting go what they have got. They were ready to fight on the accession of Texas, and are equally ready to fight now on her secession. Why is this? How can this strange paradox be accounted for? There seems to be but one rational solution and that is, notwithstanding their professions of humanity, they are disinclined to give up the benefits they derive from slave labor. Their philanthropy yields to their interest. The idea of enforcing the laws, has but one object, and that is a collection of the taxes, raised by slave labor to swell the fund necessary to meet their heavy appropriations. The spoils is what they are after though they come from the labor of the slave

That as the admission of States by Congress under the constitution was an act of legislation, and in the nature of a contract or compact between the States admitted and the others admitting, why should not this contract or compact be regarded as of like character with all other civil contracts liable to be rescinded by mutual agreement of both parties? The seceding States have rescinded it on their part, they have resumed their sovereignty. Why cannot the whole question be settled, if the north desire peace, simply by the Congress, in both branches, with the concurrence of the President, giving their consent to the separation, and a recognition of our independence?

Source: Henry Cleveland, Alexander H. Stephens, in Public and Private: With Letters and Speeches, Before, During, and Since the War (Philadelphia, 1886), pp. 717-729.

Share This

Use email, Facebook, and Twitter to spread the word.

Search for State Standards

All Subjects
Language Arts
Social Studies

All States
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
NGA Center/CCSSO
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

All Grade Levels
Grade: Pre-K
Grade: Kindergarten
Grade: 1st Grade
Grade: 2nd Grade
Grade: 3rd Grade
Grade: 4th Grade
Grade: 5th Grade
Grade: 6th Grade
Grade: 7th Grade
Grade: 8th Grade
Grade: 9th Grade
Grade: 10th Grade
Grade: 11th Grade
Grade: 12th Grade
Save my State

SEARCH

50 Documents That Tell America’s Story

Required reading for students, teachers, and citizens.

ACCESS NOW

Historical Documents

Special Exhibits

Professional Development Opportunities for Teachers

Other Resources

TeachingAmericanHistory.org

TeachingAmericanHistory.org is a project of the Ashbrook Center at Ashland University

401 College Avenue | Ashland, Ohio 44805 (419) 289-5411 | (877) 289-5411 (Toll Free)

info@TeachingAmericanHistory.org

© 2006-2017 Ashbrook Center | Design by CiV Digital

AS · Criminal Organizations · Economic Anger · Homeownership · Law · Paralegal Studies · power · Probate Housing Creditors Mortgages Mortgage Fraud · research · trauma

Documentation

Before the Independence Day break, I sent the FDIC 22 pages of documentation refuting the claims of Beal Bank.

To refute their claim that they owned my mother’s mortgage loan in 2003, I submitted the business name filing statement from Texas that says Beal Bank came into existence in 2010. This information came from counsel for Beal Bank and was included in the documents said counsel submitted to my attorney for the bankruptcy I was forced to file to stop the foreclosure Beal Bank claims they did not issue.

Also, I think I figured out how this scam was run for such a long time. In 2011, MGC Mortgage told me to file an Affidavit of Heirship to become authorized to take over my mom’s mortgage. I sent a copy of this document that I was told, after submitting it, was not the appropriate document to use, and I would still not be authorized to discuss the loan. What they did was create a file with my name misspelled with the addition of a superflous letter. All information about the property went into this file, including the insurance information. My name is on the insurance from 2011 and MGC Mortgage knew this. The name on the homeowner insurance and on the mortgage must match to be legal. I sent a copy of my insurance declaration from 2011 with MGC Mortgage listed as a lienholder and showing my last name misspelled, thus putting to rest the lie that they had no notice of my mom’s death until 2013 during probate.

To the Beal Bank 15: Check all your documents for errors of this nature. Name misspellings and missing document numbers that would allow for tracking a document’s history over time. Having acquired the original Trust Deed document with all escrow and loan numbers, I was then able to send FDIC and Beal Bank the document showing that Residential Credit Solutions was the servicer of the mortgage and held it at the time Beal Bank claims to have owned the loan.

I sent many other documents to FDIC to support my claim that I have been robbed by Beal/MGC/Dovenmuehle et al. systematically over time, starting from 2008 when the real estate bubble burst and spilled corruption out all over American mortgage consumers.

I want my insurance money back. In fact, I want all money back that was paid to this institution because I am not convinced that their claims are at all valid. If there was a valid claim, why all of these lies, obfuscations, and the dreaded runaround?

 

 

 

 

 

Criminal Organizations · Economic Anger · Homeownership · Insurance · Law · observations · Paralegal Studies · power · Probate Housing Creditors Mortgages Mortgage Fraud · trauma

Grant Hamilton, General Counsel for Beal Bank, SSB, Plano, TX is a I-Don’t-Want-to-Know-Anything Brass-Plated Schmuck

4.3.2017 Called MGC Mortgage, Inc., Lake Zurich IL, to ask for my property tax refund. Spoke to Jennifer, Anthony, Jocelyn, and supervisor Josh. He told me he would research and return my call. He never did.

4.4.2017  Spoke to supervisor Mary Ann. She said she would give a message to supervisor Josh. Gues she didn’t.

4.5.2017  Finally, spoke to Harvey. He seemed to work in the research department and had some knowledge of the history of payment associated with loan number 1423927043. He told me there was no listing of the source of payoff on the loan, other than my mother’s estate, which has been closed for two years. No note in the file that the check was from Safeco insurance and that the monies were homeowner’s insurance claim funds. Harvey transferred me to supervisor Tyler who truly did not want to talk with me. It was Harvey who told me MGC employees are not allowed to provide their last names to customers. What a way to run a financial institution, eh?

Supervisor Tyler, long story short, assured me my property tax refund check would be sent to me, payable to me instead of my mother’s estate which ceased to exist once probate closed. Beal Bank filed foreclosure against my property as probate closed. They headed all their documents to the Estate even though they knew the estate was closed and I was the legal owner of the property. They also took my money, that was in my name, to pay their claim, cloaking the payment to look as if it were drawn from funds other than my own.

4.7.2017 I called to speak with supervisor Tyler and was told by Josh and Brad Cox that they would investigate the problem I was having getting my property tax refund returned to me. He connected me to pisspot General Counsel for Beal Bank Grant Hamilton, whose name oughta be Stonewall Jackson. According to him, there is no one higher up the food chain than he in the legal department. One whole attorney for in-house counsel. Beal Bank likely has thousands of lawyers for litigation.

As he shrugged me off on Medium.

This arrogant troll told me Beal Bank owed me nothing, that they had no interest in my property, and had nothing, document wise or any wise, to return to me. Hamilton defended the right of Beal Bank to rob me. What’s that joke about a billion lawyers at the bottom of the ocean being a good start?

I have been writing complaints about Beal Bank for three years now. I concluded agencies like FDIC, CFPB, the whole lot of the alphabet soup of agencies charged with consumer protection, are powerless against, and in bed with the corporations that bedevil us.

That smug fart Grant Hamilton…with his shrugs…and lack of ethics. Putz.

 

 

 

AS · Criminal Organizations · Law · News and politics · observations · power · social observation · Sociology · trauma

Simmering

Put my anger in a pot on the back burner, letting it simmer while trying to understand how my elected officials are planning to let an old-ass, unfit, lying buffoon take over leadership of my country.

All those lawyers, and they are going to allow an idiot blowhard bastard (did he even have a mama?) to be in violation of the Constitution from day 1? Every senator who attends the inaugural should be voted out ASAP and then choked with their law degrees. Every legal and political scholar who supports this travesty should lose her or his citizenship ASAP.

PEEOTUS may be depraved. He is definitely dishonest. He is absolutely despicable, likely seditious, making of my country a laughingstock. Authoritarianism and perversion go together. Think Caligula, Tiberius Ceaser, the Catholic Church, Christianity. My people who voted for this ass should be feeling robbed and raped about now because they have been by an infantile cunt. How can this be happening?

I tweet rude, insulting, nasty things to PEEOTUS the schmuck. He reveres the poisoner-in-chief. I hope he gets some tea.

Excuse me while I add some pepper to the pot.

Criminal Organizations · Disaster · News and politics · observations · power · Sociology · Uncategorized

What’s the word?

We now know for a fact that the government of Russia and Vladimir Putin is blatantly interfering in this year’s presidential election, most notably by hacking into and strategically releasing the emails and computer files of Democratic organizations and campaign officials. There has been no equivalent targeting by Russia of Republican organizations or the Trump…

via The full implications of the Trump-Putin alliance — Jay Bookman

Criminal Organizations · Economic Anger · Law · Paralegal Studies · power · Probate · Probate Housing Creditors Mortgages Mortgage Fraud · research · Sociology · trauma

Beal Bank (Real/Real)

In 2014, Beal Bank (6000 Legacy Drive, Plano TX, 75024 469.467.5000) foreclosed against my home via a Trust Deed.

They have been paid off through their affiliate, MGC Mortgage/Dovenmuehle Bank (Dovenmuehe Mortgage Inc, 1 Corporate Dr., Lake Zurich IL, 60047 No working phone number).

After paying off a Trust Deed, children, the original instrument should be returned to the legal owner of the property.

Beal Bank has not returned my Trust Deed. The Bank seems unaware that it foreclosed on my property. Zieve Law (30 Corporate Park, #450, Irvine CA, 92606 714.848.7920) placed a lien on my property, but there was no Trust Deed, else probate judge would have informed me of its presence.

Language has been changed in documents submitted to BK court to no longer reflect payoff of a Trust Deed, but payoff of a mortgage. However, foreclosure documents state there is a Trust Deed.

Where, oh where can my Trust Deed be? I do not want my son to have to live through this nightmare.

 

Criminal Organizations · Economic Anger · Homeownership · Insurance · Law · Paralegal Studies · power · Probate Housing Creditors Mortgages Mortgage Fraud · Sociology · trauma · Uncategorized

DEAR FDIC (Real/Real)

I am submitting this summation of my experience with Beal Bank for your later regulatory review of the Bank. If, as your representative informed me at my last call to your agency, Beal Bank is not required to give me an accounting of the loan, nor required to maintain records from the origination of the loan, nor do anything other than assert their right to foreclose on my property, then it is true that the agencies alleged to serve consumers truly do nothing except support the interests of banks. I wondered why your representative was arguing so vehemently for the Bank, so I did some research and found the FDIC actually buys accounts and sells them to the banks. This was the case with Beal Bank. Seems like a conflict of interest, but I’m only a consumer who now understands I can expect no help from FDIC.

Beal Bank, through their attorneys, Zieve, Brodnax & Steele, LLP, have alleged that a claim was filed against my mother’s estate, that Beal Bank owned the loan from 2003, and that a trust deed was signed over to them by AAmes Home Loan in 2004. Also, my home is scheduled to be sold at auction on 7 June 2016.

For the record, there was a trust deed recorded between my mother and AAmes Home Loan. Zieve Law falsified documents saying the trust deed was made over to Beal Bank.

As I stated before, Beal Bank did not own the loan in 2003. They did not begin servicing the loan until 2007-2008. That is as far back as they can account for the loan, and that would make sense as AAmes and RCS were the prior servicers of the loan. At no time in all the time I made payments to MGC/Beal Bank was a trust deed mentioned. Also, you now are in possession of the statement from MGC that they had been notified of my mother’s death in 2008, the year they began servicing the loan. Yet, they continued to do business with a dead woman even though I tried many times to find out what I needed to do to be recognized as the party now responsible for the property.

Zieve Law filed a document with the bankruptcy court that is made to look like a claim was filed against the Estate. However, the Final Distribution states no claims were filed. MGC Mortgage was the only creditor notified of the probate and would have needed to file a claim as my mother died in 2005 and there are time constraints associated with filing a claim, particularly when the decedent has been dead longer than one year. Not only was a claim not filed, but foreclosure proceedings were started as probate was closing.

MGC/Beal Bank does not service home mortgages according to their statement, so I do not understand why, if a trust deed was held, and my mother’s death was known, why I was instructed by MGC/Beal Bank to “just keep paying the bill?” Why was I made to complete loan modification documents, several times, when home mortgage loans are not serviced? Why was the communication with the servicer in Illinois cut off when they were the entities I had been taking instruction from since 2008? FDIC suggested I work directly with the servicer, but they will not communicate with me directly. I have called their representatives to reach disconnected numbers.

To say that it does not matter when probate is filed, as MGC’s representative did, is disingenuous. Because I filed probate seven years after my mother’s death, I was responsible for the back taxes, calculated from her date of death. Had I filed probate before filing the change of ownership paperwork, I would not have incurred the large tax bill that prevented me from closing probate for two years. The Escrow department paid the taxes, but the department that dealt with loan modification was unaware of this. When I called MGC in Illinois to let them know probate was closed, I was told that I couldn’t close probate because I owed back taxes, not that there was a trust deed. When I sent a copy of the Final Distribution, suddenly all lines of communication shifted to Texas.

I have sent paperwork to the tax assessor’s office that should result in a recalculation of the taxes, bringing them back to the level they were at my mother’s death as I qualify for certain exclusions and exemptions that could only be accessed following probate.

Throughout this process, I have been portrayed as a liar, not notifying MGC/Beal Bank of my mother’s death until 2012.  MGC/Beal Bank is not communicating with me. They are, however, attempting to run roughshod over the probate court’s findings to take my property.

Zieve Law wrongfully foreclosed on my property, filed no claim in probate court, recently posted their name rather than MGC/Beal Bank on the listing of trust deeds filed with the County Recorder. Zieve Law also states in their foreclosure paperwork that they performed their due diligence in attempting to contact my mother regarding the matter. Really, when they knew she was dead from 2007? Why all the subterfuge when, if a legitimate trust deed was held, a claim could have been filed with the probate court in 2012? Because Zieve Law has falsified documents, violated the probate findings, and wrongfully foreclosed on my property, and forced me into bankruptcy and destroyed my credit, I am reporting them to the California Bar Association for their questionable legal practices.

As the regulatory authority, and business partner of Beal Bank, I do hope an objective review of this financial institution will occur. However, I believe this will not happen. All agencies I have had the misfortune to contact during this ordeal stand firmly behind the entities that are hurting consumers. I do have an attorney, but what about those who do not have the means to hire counsel to fight behemoths like Beal Bank? We simply lose, right? And the robber barons continue to fleece us with the support of agencies charged with assisting consumers fight the deep pocket banks.

Thank you for your attention.

 

cc: Congresswoman Janice Hahn

      Senator Elizabeth Warren

ADDENDA

21 September 2016

To date, MGC Mortgage/Beal Bank/Zieve Law have taken proceeds from my insurance claim to satisfy the trust deed. I am owed payment for the overage, but cannot get a check issued in my name because, according to MGC Mortgage, they “are allowed to process checks only in the name of the mortgage holder.” Despite repeated calls to Beal Bank, as no one at MGC will speak to me because they “have no authorization” to do so, I cannot get this money refunded to me in my name.

MGC knows that the Estate of Bessie M. Turner has been closed for two years as they started their foreclosure when probate was closing, therefore I cannot get the measly $400 that was left over from their beggaring the insurance funds that were in my name. I have been told by several contractors that the taking of the insurance funds to pay the mortgage is illegal, but if it is, no doubt whatever their actions are they will be found legal as they have been through this entire process.

I still do not know if I have clear title to my property as MGC/Beal Bank will not return the original trust deed. Perhaps the law has changed and they no longer have to return this document, but I will just have to wait and see what happens as I have no one, no legal counsel to explain what MGC/Beal is doing, and they are unwilling to communicate directly with me.

This brings me to the crux of the matter. Average people do not have adequate access to good legal representation that fights the likes of Beal Bank. Lawyers are in it for the money. Pro bono is a sham. Legal Aid offers such limited options for those of us with no money when we all know that is the grease on the wheel in this monetized materialist milieu. They are known for all the matters for which they offer no help, just as are most of the consumer agencies that claim to be there for us poor slobs.

If not for luck and grace, I’d have lost my home to these scoundrels, thanks in part to the lack of adequate access to protections and protectors of consumers and their rights, and in large part, to a lack of money.

I was able to access a bankruptcy attorney to stop the foreclosure long enough for Mother Nature to provide a way out of this nightmare relationship with MGC/Beal. Turns out he was only in it for money, not to truly assist his client. Now that my mother’s mortgage is paid several times, and MGC has been removed from my insurance, the coverage they tried to cause me to lose by changing the payment arrangement and then failing to pay the premium, I wait for the trust deed. Until I receive that, or some explanation of why I may not have it after having paid for it, I remain convinced that Beal Bank and MGC Mortgage have been and continue to engage in fraudulent activity with me. If Beal Bank held the trust deed, why is Zieve Law firm listed with the County Recorder’s Office as the holder of the trust deed? If this trust deed is legitimate, why wasn’t it brought to my attention at the time of my mother’s death? Why is there no transparency in these shenanigans?

I do hope you will investigate all of these entities. They are crooked as a barrel of fish worms. Meanwhile, be sure to read my blog about the goings on at https://nessasnotions.wordpress.com.

Class · Criminal Organizations · Economic Anger · Homeownership · Insurance · observations · Paralegal Studies · power · Probate Housing Creditors Mortgages Mortgage Fraud · research

Beal has been Paid (Real/Real)

Insurance proceeds totaling more than the amount demanded by Beal Bank/MGC Mortgage, Inc. have been received by the bankruptcy department in Lake Zurich, IL, original handler of my mortgage payments, loan modification requests, originator of requests for Affidavits of Heirship and directions to get title to the property without ever    mentioning probate.

As MGC  Mortgage, Inc. is listed as a lienholder on my homeowner insurance, the checks are made to both of us. I had to endorse the checks and send them to Beal Bank as bankrutcpy payments. It is allegedly illegal for them to take the monies and leave me high and dry for repairs to my home. I want them to continue breaking the law as with them I want no further truck.

However, I expect them to come up with some trick to keep me in bankruptcy and under their thumbs until Rapture. They have managed it this long, portraying me as the irresponsible, underhanded one who failed to report my mother’s death to them until I filed probate. They also claim that they have held this loan from 2003, two years before my mother’s death. These claims are in the court documents, made by attorneys for Beal. In documents from MGC to the FDIC, they admit they had knowledge of my mother’s death from 2008. This makes sense as I paid two other companies for this loan before I began paying MGC Mortgage in 2007-8. Nevertheless, I’m the lie and Andrew Beal is the rich, pretty boy.

We will see . . ..